That sugar is bad I wrote and told you in all sauces: our diet is normally too high in the consumption of fructose, where fructose does not simply mean fruit sugar, but a type of simple sugar that together with glucose composes sugar as well as a large part of the sweet substances in circulation, but taken alone, or without the vitamins, mineral salts and amino acids of fruit, as used in industry, it behaves like a toxin, altering not only the our sugar metabolism, and causing us metabolic syndrome and insulin sensitivity, but above all our fat metabolism. While glucose is absorbed directly into the blood,Liver and intestine are the great allies of our fitness and body weight. That’s why we need to limit sugar. We can indulge in a dessert or ice cream no more than once a week if they contain granulated or cane sugar or worse, dextrose and other industrial sweeteners (present in all sweet products on the market, sometimes even salty) such as corn syrup, syrup wheat, rice sugars. But in everyday life it is necessary to find healthy alternatives that allow us to eat sweets and cook sweets without too much stress. therefore,
To combat the negative effects of fructose, the ideal is to choose those foods that contain it in the most natural form possible.Therefore, they must be food and not simply sugars. I did a long research to understand what could be valid alternatives to sugar, going to read all the pros and cons. In this article it is no coincidence that stevia is missing, which like all zero-calorie sweeteners, equally causes an insulin response (and, worse, empty), distorting the sense of satiety of what we eat, as it has the same effects as sugar (sweet taste, which the brain recognizes and regulates the insulin response).